top of page

Federal court decisions invalidate both the $100,000 H1B fee and the nationality-based USCIS processing hold

  • Jun 9
  • 1 min read

On June 8, 2026, in California v Mullin, a federal district court found the $100,000 fee imposed by Presidential Proclamation 11011 to be invalid and vacated the proclamation imposing it. (See our prior news posting: USCIS Clarifies the $100,000 H-1B Fee.)  


On June 18, 2026, the Trump administration filed an appeal of that decision to the First Circuit Court of Appeal. Other lawsuits against the $100,000 fee remain pending. (See our prior news postings: U.S. Chamber of Commerce files 2nd lawsuit against the $100k H-1B proclamation and Complaint filed against $100k H-1B proclamation.) 


On June 5, 2026, in Dorcas v USCIS, a federal district court deemed invalid certain nationality-based USCIS policies which placed a hold on certain immigration benefits. These included holds on asylum processing, comprehensive re-review of prior grants of immigration benefits to nationals of “travel ban” countries, and country-specific policies on negative discretionary factors due to nationality in a “travel ban” country. On June 18, 2026, the administration filed an appeal and moved for stay of the vacatur. (See our prior news postings: USCIS hold, Proclamation effective January 1, 2026, and Proclamation effective June 9, 2025.) 

 
 

Recent Posts

See All
DOL proposes rule to change prevailing wages

On March 27, 2026, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) issued a proposed rule to increase prevailing wage levels applicable to H-1B and PERM programs. DOL proposes to revise how prevailing wages are c

 
 
bottom of page